ReviewMedical2026
Psychological and neuropsychological effects of adolescent cannabis use: a structured narrative review.
Miazzi R.; Cestonaro C.; Terranova C. · Journal of addictive diseases · 2026
Research summary
**Background & Methods**
This structured narrative review examined psychological and neuropsychological effects of cannabis use during adolescence using human studies identified through MEDLINE/PubMed searches. Fifty-five studies meeting eligibility criteria were included in the analysis, focusing on developmental impacts during this vulnerable period.
**Key Findings**
• Adolescent cannabis use was frequently associated with increased depressive and anxiety symptoms, psychosis-spectrum experiences, and cognitive impairments including deficits in memory, attention, inhibitory control, and executive functioning.
• Neurobiological alterations were documented in multiple brain regions, including abnormalities in cortical maturation, reward-control connectivity, white matter integrity, and neurochemical markers involved in cognition and emotion regulation.
• The evidence suggests cannabis exposure during adolescence may contribute to psychological and neurobiological changes, though causal relationships remain difficult to establish definitively.
**Dosage & Administration**
Not reported.
**Safety & Adverse Effects**
Adverse effects identified include depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, psychosis-spectrum experiences, memory impairment, attention deficits, and inhibitory control dysfunction. Neurobiological adverse effects include alterations in cortical maturation, disrupted reward-control connectivity, compromised white matter integrity, and abnormal neurochemical markers in brain regions governing cognition and emotion regulation.
**Evidence Quality**
The review is limited by several methodological constraints that reduce causal interpretation. Key limitations include: (1) confounding factors inadequately controlled across studies; (2) polysubstance use complicating attribution of effects to cannabis alone; (3) heterogeneous exposure measurement methods limiting comparability; and (4) differences in study design affecting consistency of findings. While longitudinal and neuroimaging studies provide evidence supporting a possible contributing role of cannabis, the cross-sectional nature of many studies, inability to account for selection bias, and potential reverse causality limit definitive causal conclusions. The authors emphasize that adolescence represents a particularly vulnerable developmental period and recommend prevention strategies and further rigorous longitudinal research to establish causality and clarify mechanisms underlying cannabis-related effects on psychological and neuropsychological development.
Summary generated by DeepWeed from the published abstract. See the original paper for full methods and results.
Journal
Journal of addictive diseases
Ask how this study fits the wider evidence — across 26,000+ papers.
Ask DeepWeed
More recent cannabis research
- Athletes and Medical Staff in Elite Contact Sports: a Quantitative Analysis of Use, Knowledge, and Attitudes Regarding Cannabinoids.Sports health
- Trends before and after legalization and COVID-19 on cannabis use among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver, Canada: A prospective cohort study.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique
- Retention behavior of 39 cannabinoids in reverse-phase liquid chromatography using C18 or phenyl hexyl columns.Journal of chromatography. A
- Cannabinoids: Sources, Applications, Pharmacokinetics, and Analytical Challenges for their Monitoring in Complex Matrices.Advances in experimental medicine and biology
- Perceptions and behaviours surrounding cannabis use during pregnancy, breastfeeding, and early parenting in Canada: a qualitative study.Journal of cannabis research
- Whole-blood transcriptomic findings in emergency department patients with suspected cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome: a pilot study.Journal of cannabis research
This page summarises published research for informational purposes only — it isn't medical advice. Always refer to the original publication for full methods, results and limitations.